Saturday, March 03, 2007

Five reasons why I think Christians should baptise their children

For most of my life, I've held to "believers only" baptism (i.e. usually adult, or at least older children). But tomorrow, I am having all three of my children (aged 4.5 yrs, 2 yrs and 5 mths) baptised. Why am I doing this?

I am doing this because I have come to quite firmly believe that Christian believers should baptise their children. [Note, I still do not think unbelievers or "nominal Christians" should baptise their children; it is that practice that turned me off infant baptism for so long.]

Why do I now think this? I could go on for ages, and I'm not sure I'm yet able to articulate this as well as I'd like to, but here's five reasons:

1. The starting point is to say that baptism itself is important. On its own, the mere splashing or pouring or immersing in water may not necessarily mean much, but what that water points to are things of profound and amazing wonder - the washing away of sin, our burial and resurrection with Christ, and the pouring of God's Spirit into our hearts. In the New Testament, baptism was the expected norm for the Christian, the sign that you belonged to God and were part of his community. I could go on. But the point is, we too often undervalue baptism (some can also overvalue it) but it is a wonderful thing because it points to even greater things.

2. I believe that Jesus's great commission of making disciples of all nations, baptising them and teaching them to obey all he had commanded, starts at home with our own family - we are to baptise and teach our children, that they too might be disciples of Christ. Indeed, we should treat them as little disciples from day 1. We treat them as part of God's family, part of the church. We don't treat them as pagans requiring conversion, but as little Christians requiring discipling.

3. It is often said that there is no precedent in the New Testament of children or infants being baptised. Putting aside the various "households" being baptised that are referred to in the book of Acts, this argument misses the whole point of Acts. The book of Acts is all about new converts, the first generation of believers. It was groundbreaking stuff. There is nothing in the New Testament that discounts the possibility that the second generation, the children of those first believers, were baptised. Indeed, the references to households being baptised suggests that is exactly what happened.

4. One difficulty with so-called believers baptism is our definition of "belief" or "faith". We seem to require a faith that is sufficiently mature before qualifying for baptism. Why is not the faith of a three year old who knows that Jesus is God not sufficient faith? Do they have to be able to articulate the doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement to qualify? What about the little two year old who says a simple grace of "Dear God, dinner, Amen" - why is not that simple trust in God sufficient? Where do we draw the line? In my mind, the only logical time to baptise the child of a Christian family, who will hopefully never know a time when they did not know Jesus, is as an infant.

5. But in any event, ultimately baptism is not about my choice, my decision, my faith. What I love about infant baptism is that it shifts the emphasis to God's choice, God's decision and God's faithfulness. Just as the initiative in the baptism comes from outside the child, so too does the initiative in salvation come from outside ourselves. Our salvation is not about our own faith, but about God's faithfulness. Baptism, and especially infant baptism, points to this.


Ruth said...

Congratulations to your kids today. I loved each of my kids baptisms - especially 'D's because 'A' was really old enough to be thrilled that our church was praying especially for 'D'. 'A' invited everyone he knew to the service!!!

As someone who considers herself to have been a Christian all her life, I'd also like to say, that although I didn't quite understand everything as a child (and still don't as an adult), I certainly knew that I was/am sinful, that Jesus died for me, and that I was part of God's family.

steve said...

I always say to people, "Would you, in the words of the Bible consider your child to be a member of the kingdom?"

Most say yes, and rightly so

Then I ask, "Then why would you deny them the Christ given symbol of that reality?"

There isnt really a comback at that point

credo-baptist said...

steve, i don't know any credo-baptist that would affirm that their children are a member of the kingdom of God unless they have repented, believed, and confessed that Jesus Christ is Lord.

Andy M said...

Credo, how do you judge whether a child has "repented, believed and confessed Jesus as Lord"? If a 2 year old said they had, would you take their word for it or consider they weren't old enough to make such a confession? What about a 3 year old? A 4 year old? The problem I have with the Baptist position is that it seems to assume a child must have reached a sufficiently mature age before such a confession can be accepted as such. I just don't know where we can draw the line.

credo-baptist said...

precisely, andy. which brings me to concur with your first point.

Baptism is important.

You stated that baptism "points to ... things of profound and amazing wonder - the washing away of sin, our burial and resurrection with Christ, and the pouring of God's Spirit into our hearts."

Because it is an important act of obedience, far be it from me as a parent to baptize my child when they are not even regenerate. Their sins are not washed away. They are not broken from their bondage to sin, buried, and raised again to a new life. The Spirit does not live in their hearts.

Should they come to (God-have-mercy) reject the faith of their parents later what significance then does their baptism hold. In such a case it becomes a mockery.

I would rather that they be certain of their commitment to God before engaging in such a wonderful act. Many believers in the early church were required to engage in 1 year of intense discipleship before the church would baptize them.

Mike Doyle said...


Just a point of interest, it seems that the biblical accounts in the NT of baptism don't include a prolonged period between confession and baptism. They also don't include the baptisers questioning the baptisees faith, or doing courses etc before baptism. It seems that baptisms happened when people confessed.

Andy has pointed out the biblical accounts deal only with first generation Christians, and perhaps we need to be more cynical about people's beliefs now-a-days, helping people understand the decision they have made.

Steve - though I am not against infant baptism, I wonder what exactly I would be denying my children by with-holding baptism. I could argue that it may be helpful, as they can rely on their faith in Jesus as a sign of their Christianity, rather then an outside sign that may fool them.

Mind you - though I obviously don't hold baptism is very high regards, I do love a good baptism - what a great reminder of what Christ as done for us, and the public declaration of someone's repentance and desire to follow him! (or in an infants case, the desire of the parent).

Andy M said...

Credo - when exactly do you think a child has the opportunity to become regenerate, to have his or her sins washed away, be raised again to life, to have the Spirit indwelling? You seem to restrict this opportunity only to the person who can have a sufficiently mature faith, perhaps even to have undergone a 1 year intense discipleship course!! As Mike says, in the NT church people were baptised immediately - baptism was not withheld until a doctrine exame could be passed!

And a baptised child falling away from the faith presents no more of a mockery to baptism than does the adult who was baptised as an adult believer but later falls from the faith. That is no argument against baptising infants.

Andy M said...

But Mike, I must take issue with you elsewhere (at the risk of taking the bait of you just trying to rile me up again!!!). What's with the whole "not holding baptism in high regard"? Why on earth wouldn't you? I don't mean giving it a higher place than is warranted, but to say you don't hold it in high regard at all is a bit much isn't it??

And what's with this idea that withholding baptism from your child "may be helpful, as they can rely on their faith in Jesus as a sign of their Christianity, rather then an outside sign that may fool them." Since when do we rely on our faith in Jesus? Don't we rely on Jesus full stop? I wouldn't want to rely on my faith! That was part of the whole point of my post - baptising children takes the emphasis off my faith and puts it back onto God who is the one who initiates the very things that baptism symbolises. Baptism points to Jesus, not to me and my faith. As such, I want my children to appreciate their baptism as a pointer to Jesus. Why would I want to withhold that?

And what do you mean by an outside sign that may fool them? Don't you mean an outside sign that people may twist and misinterpret and misemphasise so as to fool them? The fact some people get baptism wrong is no reason to withhold it being administered
in a way that is rightly understood. Excuse the pun, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater Mike! There is no reason for withholding a God-given sign just because some people might misunderstand it.

Anyway, we've had this discussion before ...

Mike Doyle said...

Bad choice of words (in several parts)...

I don't have a "high" doctrine of baptism - I hope I am developing a biblical view of baptism - which at the moment (to lay my cards on the table) seems to be that it is an appropriate cultural expression of repentance and faith. And dare I say it, possibly still an appropriate cultural expression today.

You are right - I don't want to rely on my faith, but on Jesus.

But I have had hundreds of conversations with people who rely on their baptism as a sign of conversion - in fact, will look at their baptism as being made right or part of God's family.

And that is a very very common error (perhaps even more common then a "right" view of baptism), and an error you can help avoid by not baptising.

I'm not making a law here, but it is right to consider the cultural climate of where and how you do your baptism. Does your culture think baptism is a sign of repentance and faith, or something more?

So yes - the fact that some people (many people actually) get baptism wrong is a great reason not to baptise, as it becomes a stumbling block. The same can be argued of many other cultural things that may have once been useful, but are now a stumbling block (priestly robes, lent, etc etc)

Can we rescue baptism? Perhaps.

It is worth rescuing? most likely, I'm thinking it through.

Of course, none of this is me suggesting that baptism should be banned! As I said, I love a good baptism.

Andy M said...

I know where you're coming from with that Mike because one reason (amongst others) that we didn't baptise our children immediately when they were born was because we thought it might be wrongly understood by some people we know and given too high an importance.

But I now feel strongly that those who get these things wrong should not be able to spoil the party for others. I passionately believe that the response to a wrong view of baptism (or lord's supper or whatever) is not to ditch it, but to reclaim it and show how it can be done well. As you say, you love a good baptism! Let's promote good baptisms rather than not doing it at all because we think it's a stumbling block.

Also, I wouldn't put baptism in same category of "cultural things that may have once been useful, but are now a stumbling block". Neither priestly robes or lent, the two examples you gave, have NT biblical precedent and sanction, whereas baptism does.

Anonymous said...

Where are your verses??? That's a great little opinion piece, but there was no scripture. Please do some more studying and praying before you jump to conclusions that are primarily based on reason.

When the early church had divisions in their theology and were claiming one thought better than the other, Paul wrote to them about their divisions (read 1 Cor. 3): "Do not deceive yourselves. If any one of you thinks he is wise by the standards of this age, he should become a 'fool' so that he may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God's sight. As it is written: 'He catches the wise in their craftiness'; and again, 'The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile.'"

Andy M said...

Hi Symota,

Thanks for your comments brother. I'm not sure I see how the 1 Cor passage you cite applies here. Are you suggesting that just because I've put forward a view on infant baptism (hardly a minority position) I'm being divisive or applying the wisdom of the world? If you could clarify that would be good.

As to using scripture, fair call in one sense. But I wasn't setting out to provide a comprehensive scriptural defence of infant baptism, just five thoughts on the issue I'd had.

The call to point to scriptural support could equally apply to the so-called "believers' baptism" position. There's much the Bible doesn't say about baptism, and any position on baptism is going to inevitably use reason (which is not bad in itself) to fill in the gaps.

The verses in scripture regarding baptism are directed at completely new converts and are largely silent on how baptism works in the second, third, fourth etc generation of believers.

You will probably point me to the verses that say "believe and be baptised" etc. But my problem is where do you pin down exactly when a child is capable of believing? How well do they need to be able to articulate such "belief" before we treat them as part of the church? My almost 5 year old I am quite sure "believes" and has gradually grown into that, which is what I would hope for all Christian kids.

Anyway, happy to interact on it further if you want to make more comments.

Anonymous said...

[... ] is one another relavant source of information on this issue[...]

Anonymous said...

The reality is you have made your decision from the volume of silence of the scriptures. You mention the word "household", and assume the children were baptized, no indication is given that children who did not understand were baptized.

No where do we see anyone getting baptized that did not understand. And, the key passage in Acts 8:26-38 shows us that a credible profession of faith was given before baptism was administered. It is ludicrous to assume that knowledge of the existence of God equals repentance and faith, the qualifiers for baptism.

Andre said...

I enjoyed reading your blog. I am not in agreement with everything you said and feel that the reasons you believe what you do is because of the practices of the modern church.

There are only two instances which I find in the Bible that a believer gets baptized. First, it was the family in Corinth. Most commentaries say that God poured the Spirit on them because Peter and his team would of had difficulty believing that uncircumcised persons could get become believers. The second was Paul who probably repented when he saw the light and heard Jesus' voice. Both the family and Paul received baptism immediately after. The rest were persons who desired to repent and baptism accompanied their repentance. The prerequisite for baptism is to know that one is a sinner and wants to die to the sinful nature (unite oneself to Christs death)and to be resurrected in newness of life (unite oneself in Christ's resurrection). Thus become born again.

I baptize children, but they must do it as a pledge of a good conscience before God. (1 Pet 3:21) This eliminates some children. Unless they can tell me that they have sin and want to be baptized to get rid of it, I do not baptize them. There is no precedence in the early church of getting forgiveness for sin for the first time outside of baptism. In the early church it was through baptism that one died and became born again (a child of God). Then they received the Holy Spirit immediately as part of the baptism process by the laying on of hands.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Andy. We came to God because it was God that called us, not by ourselves.

Infants can believe by faith too. afterall faith comes by hearing the word of God.

John the baptist could hear the voice of mary the mother of God from the womb of his mother and he leaped with joy.

Baptism has several functions;
initiation into the kingdom of God is primary. Forgiveness of sins and receiving of the Holy spirit are part.

If a baby can be filled with the Holy Spirit from the womb (because the parents are belivers (Luke 1:41 for example) ...the scriptures confirm. So why not baptise them?

Jesus told us of the heart of God: bring the children, for they are examples of the kingdom. You need faith as litlle as a mustard seed..thats all you need. like a child's faith.

Anonymous said...

I�m not that muсh of a inteгnet readеr to be honest but уouг sites reallу nice, keep it
up! I'll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later on. All the best

My page ...

Anonymous said...

Experiencing the new bankruptcy law, the bankruptcy court judge will choose to be the one to decide whether you can file for the particular Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and get discharged from your debts. Obtaining a advance payday loans is not as difficult as you guessed. Check your rent agreement for information about late fees. To be eligible following criteria should be met: one specific. [url=]payday loans with bad credit [/url] Pay Day Uk , $t3I

Anonymous said...

The age of free body weight and massive clunky residence gyms are
permanently forgotten while using the Bowflex Xtreme 2.

my web site: Report abuse

Anonymous said...

If power teaching for females brings to mind a female Hulk, really don't fret.

Here is my page :: dumbbell sets

Anonymous said...

Just enjoying me fіrst ϳar of Stella in about a уear.
It's easy to forget how good some things really are !! Its already makin it a challenge to read all these comments.

Look at my web-site ... long term cash loans

Anonymous said...

Not several fitness center goers are capable of bench pressing 400 lbs .
even when, not to mention for the established
of 8 to ten reps.

my web blog;

Anonymous said...

I'm trying to create a similar community to this myself, there's сlearly a lot of wогκ that goes intо it.
Really intelligent community heгe, nοt easy to develop.

Here is my wеbsite ... Fast cash payday loans uk

Anonymous said...

Seems likely that the cat is out of the bag on thіs.
.. I will have a lοok and see whats coming up.

Feel free tо surf to mу blоg poѕt: Best loans

Anonymous said...

The major advantage that it provides would be the actuality that one particular can function the arms and legs for the identical time
plus the final results are fantastic.

My web blog dumbbells for kids

Anonymous said...

Bit of а collapsе in сommunicаtiοn,
nоthing amiss with beіng polite.

my page;

Anonymous said...

I will be uplоaԁіng mу own vегsiοn
οf this aѕ sοon as І've looked into it more. For now I'll ϳust
ѕay Ι'm not persuaded by it.

Look at my blog ... bad credit personal loans

Anonymous said...

Ι feel like I've been on the bad end of a stampeed after reading all this. It's blоody diffiсult геading with а hаngover.

My homepage - best rate loan

Anonymous said...

In my view, there is no poіnt getting out
of bed foг less than a grand, so it doesn't seem as though it's
worth it to me.

Take a looκ at my webpagе :: best loans for bad credit

Anonymous said...

Where wегe your rеferenсes foг thіs?

Fеel free to surf to my web рage: fast pay day loans

Anonymous said...

Yeаh, Will do - I'll add them next week, when I've got a bit of free time.

Alsо viѕit my webѕite ... fast same day cash loans

Anonymous said...

Right now I feel like I could learn about thіs
аll ԁау, it's riveting. I don't eνen neeԁ a tea yet.

Rеview my site; best payday loans uk

Anonymous said...

I personаlly diԁn't spend much time doing this myself, but I can see it's οbviouslу worth

Нave а look at my ωeb page; Best Loan offers

Anonymous said...

Hit 'copy' from windоωs ХР and then attеmpteԁ to paste into an аndroid app.

Мaybe I need to quіt lifе.

Stоp by my web site ... personal loans bad credit

Anonymous said...

Lol I just shared this as wеll. ӏt's so funny.

My weblog :: best personal loans

Anonymous said...

Television presenters, top fashion types and fashionistas had been seen in
them, thus turning these fashion garments into a thing much more
than only a fashion trend -- they were also status symbols.

My website ... bowflex selecttech 552

Anonymous said...

The Bowflex SelectTech 552's are relaxed from the palm and they are not as well cumbersome in dimensions for use through a fitness center training session.

Feel free to surf to my web site;

Anonymous said...

Aωеsοmе thingѕ heгe.
I'm very happy to look your post. Thank you so much and I am having a look forward to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

Feel free to surf to my web-site; small personal loans

Anonymous said...

fаshion's Night Out will still be held in select international cities. Hairstyle awoke women personality with different ways because working women's like to cгaft short hairs in orԁer to еven them оut аnd
get them lοoking lіke you ωant them tο.
When we ѕtarted our сomраny, wе [were] ԁеtermined tо ԁistгіbute the
merchаndise primагily through department stоres.

Whаt aгe the pros and cons οf the fashіon trend.

My web blοg :: Thoi trang nam -

Anonymous said...

Οff for a scan on mу fіngers soon, can aгdly type with this brеak.
Has anyone ever tried typing with a frаctured fingeг!

my pаge best loans on the market

Anonymous said...

I wish this was οn anԁroіd... however
if іt did I wоuld ρrobably just write things lіκe this all day аnd get little done.

Feel free to ѕurf to my web blog; cheap personal loans

Anonymous said...

Could do with readin some еxtra info on this - any reсcomendаtionѕ as to what books to read or
what fοrums I mіght join?

my blog best payday loans

Anonymous said...

I feel like I сould learn abоut thiѕ all ԁay, it's enthralling. I don't еѵеn need a cuρpa yet.

Feel free tο ѕurf to my ωeb blog; best loan deals uk

Anonymous said...

I feel like I've been on the wrong end of a stampeed after reading this. It'ѕ
bloody hard concentratіng with a hаngover.

Feel free to surf to my wеb site personal loans

Anonymous said...

So, quеѕtiοn time, dο I hаve the сhancе tо aѕk a quеstіon?

my wеb blog ... personal loans uk

Anonymous said...

Interеѕting гeаԁ, especiallу ρoѕter #5 I think it was.

Worth taking note of.

Herе is mу ωebpage bad credit personal loans

Anonymous said...

People who have limited budgets but nonetheless want the usefulness of a treadmill in the
home could select a employed treadmill.

Check out my page:

Anonymous said...

Yet another good advantage of this system is though you will be executing these and also other exercise routines, you can handle the resistance.

Have a look at my site ... adjustable weights

Anonymous said...

Thе data is іn effect insignificаnt, meaning thе оutcome maκes vеrу little

Also viѕit my web site; bad credit personal loans

MR Lakshmi said...

Teach Your Child to Read Today!

Reading is one of the most important skills one must master to succeed in life. It helps your child succeed in school, helps them build self-confidence, and helps to motivate your child. Being able to read will help your child learn more about the world, understand directions on signs and warnings on labels, allow them to discover reading as an entertainment, and help them gather information.

Learning to read is very different from learning to speak, and it does not happen all at once. There is a steady progression in the development of reading ability over time. The best time for children to start learning to read is at a young age - even before they enter pre-school. Once a child is able to speak, they can begin developing basic reading skills. Very young children have a natural curiosity to learn about everything. They are naturally intrigued by the printed texts they see, and are eager to learn about the sounds made by those letters. You will likely notice that your young child likes to look at books and thoroughly enjoys being read to. They will even pretend to behave like a reader by holding books and pretend to read them.

At what age can you start teaching a child to read? When they're babies? At 2 years old, 3, 4, or 5 years old, or wait until they're in school?

If you delay your child's reading skill development until he or she enters school, you are putting your child at risk...

Did you know that 67% of all Grade 4 students cannot read at a proficient level! According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, of those 67%, 33% read at just the BASIC level, and 34% CANNOT even achieve reading abilities of the lowest basic level!

There is a super simple and extremely effective system that will even teach 2 and 3 year old children to read.

This is a unique reading program developed by two amazing parents and reading teachers, Jim and Elena, who successfully taught their four children to read before turning 3 years old. The reading system they developed is so effective that by the time their daughter was just 4 years 2 months old, she was already reading at a grade 3 level. They have videos to prove it.

>> Click here to watch the videos and learn more.

Their reading system is called Children Learning Reading, and it is nothing like the infomercials you see on TV, showing babies appearing to read, but who have only learned to memorize a few word shapes. This is a program that will teach your child to effectively decode and read phonetically. It will give your child a big head start, and allow you to teach your child to read and help your child develop reading skills years ahead of similar aged children.

This is not a quick fix solution where you put your child in front of the TV or computer for hours and hope that your child learns to "read"... somehow...

This is a reading program that requires you, the parent, to be involved. But the results are absolutely amazing. Thousands of parents have used the Children Learning Reading program to successfully teach their children to read.

All it takes is 10 to 15 minutes a day.

>> Click here to get started right now. How to Teach a 2 or 3 Year Old to Read.